[SOLVED] No permissions provided for action 'read'

I have a very weird error;

In a function I'm using dynamic keys to perform read write operation in rows. I have the scopes for read and write rows.

The function perform successfully listRows at the beginning of the function, but later in the code I have a table holidays with a date and description fields

The previous read are nothing special and it doesn't too much time to read information

Without any permission in the table I get this error

If in the table I add users:read I got this error:

If I add any:read

I'm out of ideas to debug this error

I'm using:

Appwrite: 1.8.0
node-appwrite: 20.3.0

What if you use the older collection API/methods

I just checked and it seems to be the problem, doing the request with the new API method, I got the error but with the older one, It runs without problem

We had a bug where the Console wasn't registering the new scopes so maybe that's the issue.

I just released 1.8.1. maybe you can try that. It requires a migration though

I've upgraded (everything ok with upgrade+migrations)

But I keep with the problem, the bug was to solve the scopes in the function?

If the old API work shouldn't be the console problem right?

Maybe update the scopes in the settings

it seems to be like a problem with dynamic keys, as the few minutes (maybe 1 or 2) after deployment the function runs without problem

I did it, I have added all database scopes

The docker logs keep showing:

You removed, saved, added, and saved again?

Yes, more than once.

Clear cache, removed all scopes, saved,
Added all, saved

But if it's realated to the console bug, it should always fail right?

but if you use the collection API it always works?

Yes, now I have two request in the function, one with the classic and one with the new one. At the beginning, both works and a few minutes later, the classic keep working and the new one gives me the error AppwriteException: The current user is not authorized to perform the requested action.

To resume better the issue:

I have added the classic call and the new API call

• databases.listDocuments

• databases.listRows

• I'm using dynamic keys

• A few minutes after deploy, the function works without problem

• After 3 or 4 minutes it starts to show the error AppwriteException: The current user is not authorized to perform the requested action ( in the function)
  No permissions provided for action 'read' (in the backend)

But databases.listDocuments never throws an error, I always see

{"total":0,"documents":[]}}

I have log the key and it always gets a new one, so the problem must be listRows

I've tried to replicate this bug on cloud, but it seems to work without problem, the only difference is, I'm using bun on self-host and node in cloud, I don't think that matter though

Heyy @Guille 👋 Let's get to the bottom of this.

First let me ping @user. TLDR; Seems we got some issue with authorization, but weirdly it works with listDocuments no issue, but doesnt work well with listRows (in edge cases). Any idea what might be the bug, based on that difference?

@Guille In the meantime, I will debug from my end regarding dynamic keys and Function executions, but first, I will need to reproduce it. Is it something that happens consistently for you in a specific setup? If we reproduce the issue locally, that would instantly mean a fix for us.

Thanks for you answer @Meldiron

I was trying to isolate the issue and reproduce it, and I have discovered what was the problem, and it's not appwrite fault.

I've my own version of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ip2aljprvg&t=6s

I have created a package that allows me use the syntax proposed in that video. The package handles de initialization, for CSR and SSR, and here was the problem. In SSR, it uses a global instance of the client and that instance wasn't updating the dynamic key. I have push a fix to update the api key each time the function is called and it have solved the issue.

I'm sorry for took your time 😅

Thanks again @Meldiron and @user

[SOLVED] No permissions provided for action 'read'